Japanese reaction to the SJW bullshit against Red Cross and Uzaki chan. Also ENVIRONMENTAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT bullshit.

*We have Tumblr Feminists. Japan have TWITTER FEMINISTS.

Japanese Red Cross are doing an collaboration with "Uzaki chan ha asobitai" and it is using a poster like that. I think it is really insensitive.. Why are they using an illustration like that? I think it is because of the lose of the feeling of what is socially acceptable but this is the same thing like as an ENVIRONMENTAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN PUBLIC SPACE. I sent my opinion to Japanese Red Cross.

archive.is/aZ7cZ

It's not a content that a public organization should expose. Wasn't there anyone who said some objection or aprehension about using that image for that?

I think about this everytime this happens. There were already numerous times that people withdraw those kind of stuff after get criticized for it. When do they learn?

It's disgusting. I want to puke.

Some days ago I made a reservation to donate blood. When I saw the poster at the entrance. I was paralyzed. I did a U-turn and went back to home.

The picture made me remember how I was touched in the train. How someone grabbed my breasts while passing by. How I was pushed down and have my clothes taken. The poster made me remember it all at once. I panicked. It's suffering.

I was targeted for molestation because my breasts are big...

The poster is working like a good talisman.

You say this with the same mouth what defended the Triennale*?
What a double standard. If you don't like that, try donate blood as much as males, otaku does. Do it if you can.

*TK is talking about the "Non-liberty of speech" exhibition that happened at Aichi Triennale. The exposition, oversimplifying it, it was mostly a left wing exhibition that almost only shows cases that left wings was censored with almost no case of left wing censoring stuff. It has arts that were basically a fuck you to everything that is sacred for the Japan. Also they asked for tax money to be used on this exhibition.

So are you saying woman with big breasts should not be in public? What a wonderful sense of human rights you have.

Don't you think you are too early to participate in society? How about restart from kindergarten?

Your parents and teachers did not give you a good education.

Can the liberty of expression be supressed with "It's umpleasant" as a reason for it?

How shallow...How despicable. This is not a argument based on feeling, don't you understand that? Don't you understand that japan is not updated in ethically. morally and in human right perspective compared to other developed countries?

Good night, Okita Raiku. Isn't your counter argument a argument based on feelings too?Also there are legally no problem to expose this poster in Japan.If there is a problem, the one who wants to take down should go to court.

Also why you called me despicable? Are there any despicable things presented in my opinion? Did you defame me with no reason?

You say japan is not ethically, morally and human rightly updated but You are the one who lacks update in ethics, moral and human rights for defame me as despicable for no reason.

Excuse me from the side.

Raiku is known in (japanese) twitter for being a HYPER trouble maker. (He/She was banned and restricted many times before.) It's better not give attention to him/her.

Thanks for the warning. I'm very happy for it. But, this time their side has the fault. I will fight to the end against unfairness. There are no such crime like "ENVIRORMENTAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT" on the Uzaki chan who I love so much.

All Right!!

A lawyer who says it's ok to burn the image of the emperor while says it's unforgivable to have anime girl on Red Cross poster.

Hmm...That's...kinda...shit.

The objective of this poster is to make the donation of blood higher. It makes sense to use manga character to appeal to younger age because only few of then donate blood.

To be honest, this poster have nothing to do with you. You elderies who see this as envirormental sexual harassment should gtfo. You are disturbing.

Here we go again Oota Keiko's standard based on feeling with this "Environmental sexual harassment"....
So she considers anime drawing of characters with big tits, just by that, as sexual harassment.

Wrong "Feminist: It's big tits so it's sexual harassment."

Correct "Feminist: The existence of drawing with big tits makes me remember the nasty image of the otakus who sexually loves it. It feels like their lust is being directed to something that belongs to my category (woman in general) and it is unpleasant. That's why it is sexual harassment."

Obs: He is NOT a feminist. He is just showing how the feminist's twisted logic looks like.

As a girl, this is impossible to comprehend.
By that logic, girls with big tits will could not get out of home, they would have to stay at home.
If this is not ok then what could happen with the 3 sisters of Cat Eyes, the anime of Showa period.
They had big tits for that time...

Exactly. The mere fact of having big tits would make them environmental sexual harassment just by existing by that logic. That's why the lawyer Oota Keiko is trully an agressor to the woman.

If emphasis on tits are not allowed, many things will be considered not ok.

It's written here. The answer about the logic in the heads of the feminists who gets triggered/spouts saying "muh envirormental sexual harassment" by looking at 2d illustration. Please take a look.

Obs: It's a paid article.